SPX vs. SPY vs. QQQ: Choosing the Best Underlying for 0-DTE Trading
A practical guide for intraday options traders
1. Why 0-DTE?
Zero-days-to-expiration (“0-DTE”) options have exploded since daily expirations became available on SPX, SPY and QQQ. They routinely account for 40-50 % of all S&P-500 option volume and in some retail datasets SPY alone captures ≈ 88 % of 0-DTE trades. The attraction is obvious: fast-decaying premium, precise intraday risk-take, and no overnight gap risk.
But which underlying should you use? The answer hinges on six practical variables:
SPX | SPY | QQQ | |
---|---|---|---|
Underlying type | S&P 500 index | S&P 500 ETF | Nasdaq-100 ETF |
Contract multiplier | $100 × index level | 100 ETF shrs | 100 ETF shrs |
Settlement / exercise | Cash-settled, European; no early assignment | Physical shares, American; assignment risk until close | Physical shares, American |
Daily expirations | Mon-Fri (AM & PM) plus End-of-Month; listed as SPXW | Mon-Fri (Tue/Thu added 2022) | Mon-Fri (Tue/Thu added 2022) |
Typical 0-DTE liquidity | ≈ 2 m contracts / day (2025 YTD) | Highest retail flow; tightest pennies-wide spreads | Good, but thinner than SPY; spreads widen fast OTM |
Tax treatment (U.S.) | §1256 “60/40” long-/short-term blend, mark-to-market | Ordinary short-term if < 1 yr | Same as SPY |
Pattern-Day-Trader rule | Counts toward PDT (equity option) — same as ETFs | Same | Same |
2. Liquidity & Slippage
- SPY reigns for small tickets. One-strike SPY 0-DTE spreads are often $0.01-0.02 wide near-the-money, letting scalpers flip contracts for a few cents profit.
- SPX rules for size. Institutional desks prefer SPX because one contract controls ten times the notional of SPY, yet bid-ask spreads are frequently $0.05-0.10, giving better basis-point efficiency despite the bigger dollar spread.
- QQQ is a Nasdaq bet. Liquidity is healthy but order-book depth drops sooner, so wide‐wing iron condors or far-OTM hedges cost more than their S&P counterparts.
3. Contract Size & Capital Efficiency
Example at May 21 2025 close | Index/ETF price | 1 ATM call premium (≈) | Notional/contract |
---|---|---|---|
SPX (≈ 5 844) | $5 844 | $30 | $584 400 |
SPY (≈ 583 ) | $583 | $3.00 | $58 300 |
QQQ (≈ 513 ) | $513 | $2.50 | $51 300 |
For identical delta, SPX buyers post 10 × the premium, but cash-settlement eliminates the margin shock of being assigned 100 000+ shares into the close.
4. Settlement Mechanics
- SPX: Cash credit/debit based on the official index print (PM-settled for SPXW); impossible to end up long or short stock. Ideal for strategies that purposely hold through expiration (e.g., lottery puts).
- SPY/QQQ: If you forget to close ITM options, you wake up long/short 100 ETF shares. That ties up overnight margin or incurs auto-liquidation fees.
5. Taxes & Statements
U.S. traders holding SPX (or mini-SPX/XSP) benefit from automatic mark-to-market and the blended 60/40 rate, often shaving 5-10 percentage-points off effective tax versus SPY/QQQ short-term gains. Reporting is simpler (single line on Form 6781). ETFs follow normal Schedule D rules, wash-sale included.
6. Pattern-Day-Trader (PDT) & Margin
Because FINRA classifies all equity and index options as securities, four same-day round trips in five days will flag you as a PDT and require $25 k minimum equity, regardless of ticker. Futures options (e.g., ES 0-DTE) are exempt, but that is outside the scope of this comparison.
7. Advantages of SPX Over SPY for Retail Traders
While SPY is often the default choice for retail traders due to its smaller size and accessibility, SPX offers several advantages:
- Cash Settlement (No Assignment Risk): No risk of accidentally taking on or delivering ETF shares; ideal for 0DTE trades held to expiration.
- Favorable Tax Treatment: SPX falls under §1256 tax rules — 60% long-term/40% short-term gains — often resulting in a lower effective tax rate.
- Fewer Contracts, Same Exposure: Each SPX contract ≈ 10 SPY contracts, so you can achieve the same exposure with fewer day trades.
- Cleaner Execution at Size: Preferred by institutions; more efficient for trading larger notional exposure.
- Simpler P/L and Tax Reporting: Mark-to-market treatment and single-line reporting make end-of-year accounting easier.
- Expiration Flexibility: Access to both AM- and PM-settled expirations adds timing flexibility for event-driven strategies.
These benefits can make SPX a superior product for retail traders with accounts over ~$10–15k who want capital efficiency, tax optimization, and operational simplicity.
8. Can You Backtest SPY Strategies Using SPX Data?
Yes, traders can use SPX data as a proxy for SPY to backtest strategies, especially when:
- You’re modeling market-directional moves or volatility-based strategies
- You need index-level historical data and don’t require ETF-specific pricing
But important caveats apply:
Factor | SPX | SPY | Impact on Backtesting |
---|---|---|---|
Contract size | ~$500-600k notional | ~$50-60k | Position sizing and trade costs differ |
Settlement | Cash-settled (European) | Physically settled (American) | Holding to expiration behaves differently |
Dividend adjustments | Not applicable | SPY price reflects dividends | SPX doesn’t drop on ex-dividend day |
Tax treatment | §1256 (60/40) | Short-term capital gains | May affect strategy profitability |
Market hours/volume | Institutional-dominated | Retail-dominated | Order flow and fills may differ |
Bid-ask spreads | Wider in dollars, tighter in % | Tighter for small size | Scalping strategies may behave differently |
Bottom Line: SPX is a viable proxy for high-level SPY strategy backtesting, but product-level differences must be factored in before real-world deployment.
9. Which Ticker Fits Your Style?
Trader profile | Best fit | Why |
---|---|---|
Small account (< $10 k) looking for quick scalps | SPY | Tightest spreads, lower buying-power; easier to stay under PDT by using cash account |
Large directional punt on CPI morning | SPX | One contract moves ~10 × SPY; cash-settled so no assignment; ample liquidity even for 1 000-lot |
Iron-condor premium seller who often holds to close | SPX | European exercise removes early-assignment tail-risk; 60/40 taxes improve net return |
Tech-focused day trader worried about earnings-gap beta | QQQ | Pure Nasdaq-100 exposure, still enjoys daily expiries |
Gamma scalper/income bot running dozens of tiny lots | SPY | Penny increments and hundreds of strikes each $0.50 keep slippage minimal |
10. Practical Checklist Before Clicking “Send”
- Size matters. Know the notional you are controlling; SPX moves 100 per contract.
- Check the settlement window. AM-settled SPX end-of-week contracts use the opening print, not the 4 p.m. close.
- Mind your day-trade count. Cash accounts in SPY/QQQ avoid PDT but cannot use leverage; margin accounts must respect the $25 k rule.
- Model after-tax P/L, not just gross. The 60/40 split can swing net results if you trade size frequently.
- Have an exit plan. In fast markets bid-ask spreads can widen suddenly, especially in QQQ; use limit orders or pre-set stop logic.
Bottom Line
- Choose SPX if you need large notional exposure, cash settlement, and tax efficiency – and your account comfortably absorbs four-figure premiums and margin swings.
- Choose SPY if you prize razor-thin spreads, want to scale in/out with $50 k clips, or run algorithmic scalps that rely on deep liquidity.
- Choose QQQ when your thesis is specifically Nasdaq-driven or you seek a slightly smaller contract than SPY with similar mechanics.
There is no universally “best” 0-DTE underlying – the optimal choice aligns with your account size, risk tolerance, and operational constraints. Evaluate these trade-offs consciously, and you’ll sidestep most of the forum confusion around “SPY vs. SPX?”. Trade safely!
This article is for educational purposes only and is not tax, legal, or investment advice. Consult a qualified professional before implementing any strategy.
Get the most out of GreeksLab!
Create a free account or sign in to access:
- Backtester tool
- Flexible strategy builder
- High resolution data
- Advanced analytics
- And much more...